[CentOS-virt] XEN and RH 6
Grant McWilliams
grantmasterflash at gmail.comTue Nov 10 14:57:08 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS-virt] XEN and RH 6
- Next message: [CentOS-virt] XEN and RH 6
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > > > I've been wondering about the definition of PV in the context of KVM/Xen. > In the Linux on Linux case for Xen PV practically means that in the HVM > case I have to access block devices using /dev/hda while in the PV case I > can use the faster /dev/xvda. When using KVM which apparently only supports > HVM I can still install a guest using the virtio drivers which seem to do > the same as the paravirtualized devices on Xen. > > So what is the KVM+virtio case if not paravirtualization? > > Regards, > Dennis > __________ > All of it except for that! Your VM isn't just a process accessing a disk. With KVM they've attacked the most commond devices - network and disk and offered paravirtualized devices. This doesn't concern me as the speed has proven to be good although in mysqlbench Xen still leads by quite a bit. I'm concerned about everything else. With 41 interactive VMs I worry about how fast the hypervisor can switch focus, the cpu utilization of each etc.. Grant McWilliams Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll use Windows." Now they have two problems. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/attachments/20091110/04cad121/attachment-0002.html>
- Previous message: [CentOS-virt] XEN and RH 6
- Next message: [CentOS-virt] XEN and RH 6
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-virt mailing list