On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 09:53:24AM +0100, Frederic SOULIER wrote: > Hi, > > Do you really think that RHEL6 will not include dom0 version ? > It seems that KVM will be the favorite for redhat virtualisation but i > think Xen is actually largely deployed. > Well.. I don't have any facts.. And yes, Xen is largely deployed, and good solution. I use it myself, just like many others. > We have here a "cluster" of ten Xen centos 5.4 dom0 and i'm asking what > it will become with RHEL6 if there is no more dom0 version. > We think about migration from Xen to KVM but the process could be > complex and i don't know if kvm will equal Xen performance for > production use. > Anyone as the same problem/question here. > I guess we'll just have to wait.. or contact RH folks and ask/push it :) -- Pasi > Regards > > > > Pasi Kärkkäinen a écrit : > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 04:45:56PM +0100, Hildebrand, Nils, 232 wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> my local RH-salesman told me that rh6 will be based on a mix of Fedora 11/12 - so I hope for the best. > >> > >> > > > > Yeah, RHEL6 will be based on Fedora 12 (afaik). > > Also, I think RHEL6 will support running as Xen guest (PV domU), but I > > don't think they're going to ship dom0 with it.. > > > > I really hope they would, but I'm not holding my breath considering how > > much they talk about KVM.. > > > > > >> At the moment I am stuck with SLES (currently 10) on our Dom0-servers, since it has the newer XEN-version. > >> I would love to move to RH or CentOS with my Dom0s... > >> > >> > > > > Upgrade to SLES11 at least then.. I think it has Xen 3.4.1 available and > > 2.6.27 dom0 kernel. > > > > -- Pasi > > > > > >> Kind regards > >> > >> Nils > >> > >> > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: centos-virt-bounces at centos.org > >>> [mailto:centos-virt-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Pasi Kärkkäinen > >>> Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 3:58 PM > >>> To: Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS > >>> Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] High CPU usage when running > >>> aCentOSguestinVirtualBox > >>> > >>> On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 12:47:08PM +0100, Hildebrand, Nils, 232 wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> this weekend I took a closer look at KVM. I think that the > >>>> > >>> paravirtualized XEN or Hyper-V-Approach is superior to the > >>> full virtualization. > >>> > >>> PV has it's advantages.. > >>> > >>> > >>>> Red Hat 6 will have XEN-Support (propably XEN 3.4 with > >>>> > >>> power-consumption savings). > >>> > >>> What did you hear this? Is it a fact? > >>> > >>> -- Pasi > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> CentOS-virt mailing list > >>> CentOS-virt at centos.org > >>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt > >>> > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> CentOS-virt mailing list > >> CentOS-virt at centos.org > >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS-virt mailing list > > CentOS-virt at centos.org > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt > > > > > > -- > Frederic Soulier > > DSI / STAR > Universite Toulouse 1 Capitole > 2 RUE DU DOYEN GABRIEL MARTY > 31042 TOULOUSE CEDEX 9 FRANCE > Tel : +33 5 61 63 39 98 > Fax : +33 5 61 63 37 98 / Bureau : AR38 bis > http://dsi.univ-tlse1.fr > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-virt mailing list > CentOS-virt at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt