[CentOS-virt] moving from Xen to KVM

Hildebrand, Nils, 232 Nils.Hildebrand at bamf.bund.de
Wed Mar 17 14:15:52 UTC 2010


just two questions:
1. Is there anything faster than XEN-paravirtualization?

2. Why XEN 5?
XEN 3 is quite stable, too.

I have 31 DomUs up and running on a single Box - and have a strong feeling that even 60 will run flawless.
But: All of them are Para-Virtualized.

I have no problem with disk IO-Bottlenecks since my DomUs are not Database-Servers - so there is mostly static information in the filesystems.

I see no reason why I should move to KVM.
My only limitation is memory, since RAM is not being virtually mapped yet.

Kind regards


> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: centos-virt-bounces at centos.org 
> [mailto:centos-virt-bounces at centos.org] Im Auftrag von 
> Christopher G. Stach II
> Gesendet: Freitag, 26. Februar 2010 09:04
> An: Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS
> Betreff: Re: [CentOS-virt] moving from Xen to KVM
> [...]
> Here are a few tips:
> 1. F*** KVM.
> 2. Stick with Xen because there is quite a lot of time until 
> 5 is EOL'd and if you haven't noticed, it's actually a mature 
> technology. [...]

More information about the CentOS-virt mailing list