[CentOS-virt] Choices for shared network storage, NFS vs iSCSI

David Hollis dhollis at davehollis.com
Wed May 19 15:49:53 UTC 2010

On 05/19/2010 09:30 AM, compdoc wrote:
> I think iSCSI is easier to implement and is certainly fast, but I'm unclear
> about the number of iSCSI clients that can access a volume (iSCSI target) at
> the same time. So, I use it with only one client at a time.

iSCSI does allow multiple initiators to access a target simultaneously.
 Of course, the initiator's OS needs to handle the access properly via
cluster-aware filesystem (VMFS, GFS2, etc) or locking mechanisms to
avoid data corruption.  Additionally, the target implementation may
require support for certain SCSI reservation protocols to handle certain
clustering implementations.

More information about the CentOS-virt mailing list