[CentOS-virt] Libvirt NAT-based network 2x-4x faster than Libvirt routed network?
veiko at ekp.ee
Thu May 27 11:50:30 UTC 2010
On 05/27/2010 12:21 PM, Aleksei Miheev wrote:
>> Is it typo?
>> There can be no subnet with /32 bit mask, it's single host only.
> Actually, it is possible:
> ip addr add xxx.yyy.zzz.215/32 dev eth0
> ip route add xxx.yyy.zzz.193 dev eth0
> ip route add default via xxx.yyy.zzz.193
Of course you can do that, but it wouldn't a *subnet*. Net like network,
system consisting of several units.
I rest my case.
More information about the CentOS-virt