[CentOS-virt] Is kvm-clock dependant on hardware of Physical Server?
Steven Ellis
mail_lists at stevencherie.netThu Nov 4 04:25:47 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS-virt] Is kvm-clock dependant on hardware of Physical Server?
- Next message: [CentOS-virt] Which is the best network interface to use.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 17:03:33 +1300, Steven Ellis <mail_lists at stevencherie.net> wrote: > > I've got a three Centos 5.5 KVM severs, but only one of them is presenting > guests with the kvm-clock source. > > The two servers I'm not seeing kvm-clock on have Athlon x2 64bit > processors. > > The other server with kvm-clock has a Phenom II X6 1090T Processor. > > I've checked the system configuration and all the boxes have the same set > of RPM packages. To confirm that the issue was physical > hardware specific I migrated a VM from the Athlon to the Phenom server and > the kvm-clock source appeared. > > Any ideas why I'm not seeing kvm-clock with my Athlon X2 processors, or is > there another difference I haven't caught? > Well it looks like the issue relates to constant_tsc. Out of the 3 boxes only the Phenom has constant_tsc in the CPU flags. There appears to be some kernel list references here - * http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@vger.kernel.org/msg10193.html This finally led to the following docs * http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5.5/html/Virtualization_Guide/chap-Virtualization-KVM_guest_timing_management.html Looks like I need to do some tweaking at the grub level for my Athlon X2 boxes Steve
- Previous message: [CentOS-virt] Is kvm-clock dependant on hardware of Physical Server?
- Next message: [CentOS-virt] Which is the best network interface to use.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-virt mailing list