Hi, > Please help me understand why you are doing it this way? I'm using > Xen with integrated storage, but I've been considering separating my > storage from my virtual hosts. Conceptually, we can ignore the Xen/KVM > difference for this discussion. I would imagine using LVM on the > storage server then setting the LVs up as iSCSI targets. On the virtual > host, I imagine I would just configure the new device and hand it to my > VM. I am open to any suggestion. I am not really an expert of iscsi, so I don't know what is the best way to implement a solution where a small group of hv support live migration with a shared storage. This way looked rather straightforward and for some level, documented on official redhat manuals. The problem is that there is no mention about this LVM problem :( Initially I tried configuring the raw iscsi device ad storage pool but virt-manager reported it was 100% occupied even if that was not true (indeed 0% was occupied). Andrea