centos-virt-bounces at centos.org schrieb am 06.09.2012 00:51:38: > Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists at uni-x.org> > Gesendet von: centos-virt-bounces at centos.org > > 06.09.2012 00:52 > > Bitte antworten an > Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS <centos-virt at centos.org> > > An > > Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS <centos-virt at centos.org> > > Kopie > > Thema > > Re: [CentOS-virt] 802.3ad + Centos 6 + KVM (bridging) > > Am 05.09.2012 21:40, schrieb aurfalien: > > Hi all, > > > > Don't mean to double post as I sent this to the general Centos list. > > > > But, does any one have 802.3ad (mode 4) working on there Centos6 KVM setup? > > > > This would be a bridge+bond setup of course. > > > > If not possible, would I still bond the interfaces on the switch > and then bond them in the guest rather then from within the hypervisor? > > > > - aurf > > Can you explain what your precise problem is? > > I have a setup where eth0 and eth1 are bond0 (LACP) slaves and bond0 is > part of a bridge br0 (in addition VLAN is involved). That's on the KVM > host, a CentOS 6.3 install. > > Alexander > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-virt mailing list > CentOS-virt at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt I've the near the same problem: Server with bondig with 802.3ad (mode 4). This works without problem. But on this server there 4 KVM-VM in the same subnet as the server. The VM can ping all server in the subnet, but not the other VM and the host. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Andreas Reschke ________________________________________________________________ Unix/Linux-Administration Andreas.Reschke at behrgroup.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/attachments/20120906/7885a943/attachment-0006.html>