Andres, thanks for your interest. Could you elaborate what your thoughts related to CentOS 7 and the CentOS virtualization SIG are? I am not sure I exactly understand what you are proposing and it is also not quite clear to me whether there is some overlap with other SIGs (such as the Cloud SIG). I guess the key question I have is whether you are suggesting / considering to use the output of the virtualization SIG as upstream for OpenNode and would want to contribute to the SIG. Best Regards Lars On 03/04/2014 21:30, Andres Toomsalu wrote: > > Dear Scott, Lars, > > Currently we already have CentOS 6 based respin (called OpenNode - > http://opennodecloud.com) targeted for virtualization - supporting > both OpenVZ and QEMU/KVM at the moment - yet it would be possible to > add Xen/LXC/Docker support as well - as we are based on libvirt. > > We are just discussing some ideas how we would like to develop next > major version - CentOS 7 based virtualization host - yet we would be > really interested for having an open discussion and community based > development - if anybody wants to join in or there will be some > interest to create something like community CentOS virtualization host > project - where we could join. Our current ideas are spinning around > CoreOS like (perhaps stateless) CentOS 7 compute host with modern > clustering built-in (perhaps etcd) - and we still want to continue to > support both containers and full virtual machines on the same host. > Hopefully also Docker will be mature enough soon and supporting OpenVZ > userland tools - as LXC and OpenVZ share the kernel part and > surprisingly LXC seems still not enough mature/feature rich - yet LXC > project has existed already quite a long time (which makes me a bit > pessimistic predicting on future LXC progress pace). LXC container > isolation features still suck a bit (for production systems) and still > no live migration feature - yet support for it seems to come from > OpenVZ team - as http://criu.org. But hopefully we can get rid of > OpenVZ patched kernels - so it will be only the choice of userspace > tools (for containers). > > Our goal would be to have something way simpler than Openstack (which > is huge and quite a mess in its current state - if you really want to > create a production grade system with it) - and to have a nicely > packaged + easy to use system (which might not support all 1001 ways > of doing the same thing - yet enforcing some simple best-practices). > > So - if anybody interested - lets discuss! > > Kind regards, > -- > <http://www.getpostbox.com>---------------------------------------------- > > Andres Toomsalu > http://www.opennodecloud.com <http://www.opennodecloud.com/> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/attachments/20140409/5af4433c/attachment-0004.html>