Dear Colleagues: Thanks a lot, for your replies, my boss is a big fan of lxc, but I have read many forums, and what I perceive is rhel7 -> docker, centos7 ---> openvz With great difficulty, I managed a container with virt-manager, I even noticed a bug when trying to create a bridge. Conclusion, as we want to use a container operating system is better to use openvz, now is there interfaces that allow a user no expert reserve resources such as memory, cpu, etc without going to browse cgroups? Thanks in advance -Pablo On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 4:13 AM, Sven Kieske <S.Kieske at mittwald.de> wrote: > Hi Scott, > > while much of what you say is true > you somehow could lead unaware users > to the conclusion that docker and lxc > are two very different container technologies. > > In fact, docker uses lxc for containers. > So it's more a management abstraction layer > with an API. > > Nevertheless for true and secure containerization > you'll need openvz atm, sadly it's not in the kernel yet. > > -- > Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards > > Sven Kieske > > Systemadministrator > Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG > Königsberger Straße 6 > 32339 Espelkamp > T: +49-5772-293-100 > F: +49-5772-293-333 > https://www.mittwald.de > Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer > St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen > Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-virt mailing list > CentOS-virt at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/attachments/20140716/044ebe51/attachment-0006.html>