I'd not realized Citrix had shifted their publication model. If what is on github is what they use for production, *good*. Are there any major components left that are missing from github? On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Antony Messerli <amesserl at rackspace.com> wrote: > Just for clarification sake, Xen is now part of the Linux Foundation and > XenServer itself is open source as well. > > Pretty much all of the bits to generate the XenServer build and all > development of the Citrix product are done on Github now. > > I get the push to use KVM but given the amount of interest and use there was > on CentOS 6 with Xen, I believe the effort will still be made to get it into > CentOS 7, which is why it would be nice if it was upstream as well. > > From: Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> > Sent: May 25, 2014 8:58 AM > To: Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS > Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] Xen DomU supoprt in RHEL 7 and the CentOS Plan > > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Major Hayden <major at mhtx.net> wrote: >> On May 23, 2014, at 9:13, Simon Rowe <simon.rowe at eu.citrix.com> wrote: >> >>> Why do you say that? My minimal testing of the rc doesn't show any >>> problems installing on Xen 4.4 >> >> I had the same results as Simon. >> >> Running RHEL7rc as a domU on a machine running a Fedora-based Xen >> hypervisor works fine. >> >> However, there is no Xen *dom0* support in RHEL7rc. There are no tools >> either. Last time I checked, Xen support wasn't evenincluded with libvirt >> on RHEL7rc. :/ > > Given Red Hat's focus on and direct freeware support of KVM, why > should they burn cycles on open source integration of a product that > has a closed source upstream vendor at Citrix? They'd be much better > off spending the engineering time on libvirt and getting the > NetworkManager configuration tools to correctly support KVM compatible > bridging or ordinary network pair bonding, jumbo frames, and VLAN > tagging. None of that was working correctly on CentOS 6 or RHEL 6 > without hand editing config files, which would be overwritten and > scrambled by using NetworkManager to configure anything. I've not > spent time with the latest NetworkManager on the RHEL 7 betas, and > would be very curious to see if they've gotten *that* straightened > out. > > In Red Hat's position, I'd contact Citrix and get *them* to do the > testing and debugging, which they'll need to do for their commercial > products, anyway. That might get into interesting open source > licensing issues, but it's a lot cheaper than replicating testing labs > and doing Citrix's work for them. > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-virt mailing list > CentOS-virt at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-virt mailing list > CentOS-virt at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt >