[CentOS-virt] SIG repo layout and conflicts between projects within a SIG
Sandro Bonazzola
sbonazzo at redhat.com
Tue Jan 20 07:44:50 UTC 2015
Il 19/01/2015 18:19, Edward L Heron ha scritto:
> On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 12:08 +0000, George Dunlap wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> The current setup is that every sig has exactly one production repo
>> per CentOS version.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> So it seems we have a couple of ways to approach it.
>>
>> 1. Keep it one repo per SIG, and make all projects in a SIG sort out
>> shared dependencies.
>>
>> 2. Allow one repo per *project* within a SIG (e.g., virt6-xen, virt7-docker)
>>
>> 3. Have some alternate way of doing a "patch", instead of repos.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> On the whole I'm inclined to prefer #2.
>>
>> ...
>
> I vote for #2, as well.
>
I vote #2 as well. It would ease the maintenance of the repo.
> Though I'm not actively participating in pushing new releases, I'm
> interested because I've got 18 servers currently running CentOS 5 with
> Xen. I'm concerned about stability of future Xen support in CentOS if
> there are too many chefs touching the packages with the complexity of
> juggling all the virtualization flavors.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-virt mailing list
> CentOS-virt at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
>
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
More information about the CentOS-virt
mailing list