Le 04/11/2015 12:19, Johnny Hughes a écrit : > On 11/04/2015 04:31 AM, Jean-Marc LIGER wrote: >> >> Le 03/11/2015 00:49, Jean-Marc LIGER a écrit : >>> Le 02/11/2015 18:28, Johnny Hughes a écrit : >>>> On 10/31/2015 04:34 PM, Jean-Marc LIGER wrote: >>>>> Hi Lucian, >>>>> >>>>> It seems to be upstream libvirt-1.2.15-2 with options with_xen and >>>>> with_libxl enabled. >>>>> http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1348 >>>>> >>>> Right, and we can use that version, or a newer one and enable rbd as well. >>> You might use this preview one : >>> http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/libguestfs-RHEL-7.2-preview/libvirt-1.2.17-3.el7.src.rpm >>> >>> I personally rebuild libvirt from last official releases which enable >>> ceph by default for el7 : >>> http://libvirt.org/sources/ >>> >>> My dogfooding tests still **can be found here : >>> https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jmliger/virt7-upstream/ >>> >>>> The next question is, is there a difference between the generic rbd and >>>> building against ceph-devel. (As in, is one ceph only and the other >>>> generic only or can you use both when built against ceph-devel, etc) >>>> >>>> Since qemu-kvm-ev enables ceph, if we can also enable ceph in libvirt, >>>> seems like a win to me, if it also does rbd the same as building against >>>> librados2-devel and librbd1-devel. >>> Maybe I'm wrong but ceph-devel seems to have been replaced by librados2-devel and librbd1-devel in el7. >> %package devel-compat >> Summary: Compatibility package for Ceph headers >> Group: Development/Libraries >> License: LGPL-2.0 >> Obsoletes: ceph-devel >> Requires: %{name} = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release} >> Requires: librados2-devel = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release} >> Requires: libradosstriper1-devel = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release} >> Requires: librbd1-devel = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release} >> Requires: libcephfs1-devel = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release} >> Requires: libcephfs_jni1-devel = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release} >> Provides: ceph-devel >> %description devel-compat >> This is a compatibility package to accommodate ceph-devel split into >> librados2-devel, librbd1-devel and libcephfs1-devel. Packages still >> depending >> on ceph-devel should be fixed to depend on librados2-devel, librbd1-devel, >> libcephfs1-devel or libradosstriper1-devel instead. >> > I concur that the spec file uses that the way it is written. What I > wonder is *IF* one wants to use ceph specifically, then are libvirt > packages built against librados2-devel and librbd1-devel going to work > then as well? > > I do concur that it seems in the beta for rhel-7.2 this all gets > resolved for 7.2. Since that should be happening soon(ish) .. based on > previous release history, we should wait and see exactly what is in 7.2 > when released. > > We also need to test that with ceph community packages to see if rbd > built that way actually works with ceph as well. For whom wants to test, I've rebuild the last ceph community packages and libvirt rhel-7.2 preview on top of them in COPR : https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jmliger/tests-upstream/builds/ >>>> These may only work with CentOS 7 as well .. have to look at if those >>>> build in CentOS 6.7. >>> Which ceph release forCentOS 6.7Hammer or Firefly ? >>> Jean-Marc Liger >>> > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-virt mailing list > CentOS-virt at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/attachments/20151109/f3f01147/attachment-0006.html>