Ed Heron <Ed at heron-ent.com> wrote: > Absolutely, I'll share my real world results. I'm happy that I'm not > the only person interested in the technique. I'm a little disappointed > somebody isn't telling me there is a much simpler method of putting my > database in RAM. The technique is only useful in a situation where the > server has gobs of RAM so it might only apply to a small subset of users > but it might speed up database access. And since it is being done by > the virtual host, the guest doesn't need to know anything about it. > This keeps guest complexity down. Also, I don't have as much Windows > knowledge as I have Linux knowledge so it was easier for me to implement > under Linux. See, This is where I get confused again, which type of database is it?