On 01/24/2018 01:01 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:20:39PM -0600, Kevin Stange wrote: >> On 01/23/2018 05:57 PM, Karl Johnson wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Nathan March <nathan at gt.net >>> <mailto:nathan at gt.net>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> > Hmm.. isn't this the ldisc bug that was discussed a few months ago on this >>> list, >>> > and a patch was applied to virt-sig kernel aswell? >>> > >>> > Call trace looks similar.. >>> >>> Good memory! I'd forgotten about that despite being the one who ran >>> into it. >>> >>> Looks like that patch was just removed in 4.9.75-30 which I just >>> upgraded >>> this system to: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21122 >>> <http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21122> >>> Previously I was on 4.9.63-29 which does not have this problem, and does >>> have the ldisc patch. So I guess the question is for Johnny, why was it >>> removed? >>> >>> In the meantime, I'll revert the kernel and follow up if I see any >>> further >>> problems. >>> >>> >>> IIRC the patch has been removed from the spec file because it has been >>> merged upstream in 4.9.71. >> >> The IRC discussion I found in my log indicates that it was removed >> because it didn't apply cleanly due to changes when updating to 4.9.75, >> yet I don't think anyone independently validated that the changes made >> are equivalent to the patch that was removed. I was never able to >> reproduce this issue, so I didn't investigate it myself. >> > > Sounds like the patch is still needed :) > > Anyone up to re-porting it to 4.9.75+ ? It looked, at first glance, like 4.9.71 fixed it .. I guess not in all cases -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/attachments/20180124/f3ccc7dd/attachment-0005.sig>