[Centos] CentOS-3 errata - updated kernel packages fix security vulnerabilities

On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, John Newbigin wrote:

> Also, does anyone know where this link came from:
> http://mirror.caosity.org/centos-3/2.0/
> 
> I think that is a poor idea.  If it has a good reason for existing, then 
> the version should be 2 or 2.1

Of course it should be 2.1 - apologies - 

the idea is that all of the centos stuff is accessed through  centos/ eg 
centos/3.3 rather than centos-3 

should make it easier for 4.0 etc 

I will try to remember to use that when announcing updates 

Lance

-- 
uklinux.net - 
The ISP of choice for the discerning Linux user.