[Centos] Issues/thoughts re CentOS-4
Johnny Hughes
mailing-lists at hughesjr.comTue Dec 14 20:28:30 UTC 2004
- Previous message: [Centos] Issues/thoughts re CentOS-4
- Next message: [Centos] Issues/thoughts re CentOS-4
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 14:16 -0500, Andy Masiar wrote: > > But this is why I am asking which RHEL branch CEntos follows mainly because > > I had gone through Redhat comparison documentation. Is Centos 3.3 based on > > RHEL AS which has higher limits or RHEL ES which has lower ones. Is it > > possible to base it to RHEL AS? > > I don't think that the srpms packages make a distinction whether they > belong to AS or ES. AFAIK theres only two or thee packages in AS that > are not present in ES (clustering, HA) > Redhat adds artificial restraints to ES ... CentOS has all the RPMS (including those from the Extras disc). It is based on RHEL AS. > I think that AS and ES distinction applies mostly to RedHat's support > level and hardware limitations. > > > > Is the SRPMS for RHEL built on a RHEL AS > > build computer to generate CEntos RPMS? > > No idea. Would that make a difference? > It makes no difference where you compile the files.
- Previous message: [Centos] Issues/thoughts re CentOS-4
- Next message: [Centos] Issues/thoughts re CentOS-4
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list