On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 07:23:07AM -0600, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote: > > > > > - I have *no* idea whether or not Vipul's Razor is working or not. > > > > I suppose you use this at spamassassin time. Add '-D' to your spamd > > options (/etc/init.d/spamassassin) and see in your logfiles. I maded > > RPMs myself from the spamassassin tar and noticed the dependency on the > > perl-DB_File package was not specified in the spamassassin spec. You > > need that however (at least if you are doing spamassassin at local > > delivery time like I do) > > See, that's the problem. amavisd-new shows in the /var/log/maillog that > it's picking up spam assassin, whether the spamd daemon is running or not. > It seems to flag spam whether the spamd is running or not. And I don't > see any spam assassin headers that I recognize from earlier versions of > SA. > > So, I don't know if amavis is just running the spam assassin code > directly, or what. And I haven't been able to find much documentation on > the subject. I've no experience with amavis but if I understand you correctly I suppose amavis calls spamassassin and doesn't use spamc. I would change that for performance reasons. > On another note, I went with dovecot instead of courier, since dovecot > supports Maildir, which I've been wanting to use. my mbox files are > *huge*. Courier also can handle Maildir, even more, I don't think it can do mbox. > I'm not familiar with Maildrop, is it a procmail alternative? Yes: http://www.courier-mta.org/maildrop/ ( I'm currently finding out how the get it bounce messages to over filesystemquota users. It just tempfails and I don't want my queues filled this way :-( ) Cheers, -- Henk van Lingen, Systems & Network Administrator (o- -+ Dept. of Computer Science, Utrecht University. /\ | phone: +31-30-2535278 v_/_ http://henk.vanlingen.net/ http://www.tuxtown.net/netiquette/