Lance, > 'non-contiguous number component' ???? Compare: httpd-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.1.i386.rpm httpd-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2.i386.rpm By "non-contiguous", I meant that the "1" and "2" digits are separated from the main version number, 2.0.46-44. But having quickly checked the code, I am wondering why the code made the mistake of putting httpd-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.1.i386.rpm in the 28 day lag directory. (I will have to investigate more.) > m-e-v-r comparison should have picked that up ... What is a m-e-v-r comparison? Please tell me more. Thanks, Rick --- Lance Davis <lance at uklinux.net> wrote: > On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, Rick Graves wrote: > > > An Apache update in November put the new gif there > in > > place of the CentOS gif. This was fixed in a > httpd > > update early this month. > > > > This server is on a 28 day update lag. Just a few > > hours ago, yum automatically updated httpd to > version > > > Theoretically, the appearance of the more recent > > version should have blocked the installation of > the > > prior version, but the logic in the lag mirror > > software needs refinement (it is not expecting a > newer > > version to have a non-contiguous number > component). > > 'non-contiguous number component' ???? > > 1->2 is hardly non-contiguous > > m-e-v-r comparison should have picked that up ... > > > Regards > Lance > > -- > uklinux.net - > The ISP of choice for the discerning Linux user. > >