I have used WB a little too. The reason I moved over was the availability of support. I get answers to problems faster with CentOS on lists and irc. WB was good, but answers where really slow, and sometime I never got answers at all. Cheers. --- Mário Gamito <gamito at netual.pt> wrote: > Hi, > > For a few months i've been using WhiteBox Enterprise > Linux. > In fact, i've migrated all my companie's servers > (about 20) to this RHEL > distro like. > > Well, it's not that i'm not satisfied, but WBEL is a > one man show and > that causes me some preocupation. And besides, it > seems to me that it > can't stand up to the rythm RHEL evolves. > > That's why i'm writing to you, posing a few > questions, if you don't > mind to answer: > > 1 - Why did you choose CentOS ? > > 2 - If you have/had experience with WBEL, why do you > prefer CentOS ? > > 3 - Is CentOS ahead of WBEL in terms of being up to > date with RHEL ? > > 4 - Does CentOS releases an updated version > everytime RH does ? > > 5 - What is (more or less) the time gap between a > RHEL update and the > correspondent CentOS ? > > I apologise for the inconvinience and any help would > be apreceiated. > > Warm regards, > Mário Gamito > -- > http://www.startux.org/~gamito > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at caosity.org > http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com