-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Centos] is centos3.1 compatible with dag's el3 repo? Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:15:22 +0200 From: sophana <sophana78 at yahoo.fr> To: Dag Wieers <dag at wieers.com> References: <412B3E8B.7020805 at yahoo.fr> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0408241519120.6016 at horsea.3ti.be> Dag Wieers wrote: >Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think > > CentOS 3 = Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 U1 > CentOS 3.1 = Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 U2 > >Although I would have prefered CentOS to follow the Red Hat numbering >instead of adding confusion. Soon U3 will be released and there will >probably be a CentOS 3.2 release. Ok I understand, I thought the RHEL2.1 has existed so I also thought that RHEL 3.1 existed also. I would also have prefered strict redhat numbering: centos 3 update2 If redhat release RHEL3.1 what will be centos name? >>For example I wish to install evms from dag's repo. Is there any problem? > >No, any problem you encounter should be reported and fixed. It is >all designed to work together. (except for kernel module packages) > evms needs a set of kernel patch to be applied. Do you think I can find one already patched or I should do it myself? If I do it, would you be interested in having the evms patched rpm? (I don't know how to do a rpm, but I can try) Is there a problem that a package depends on a kernel rpm? Regards -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20040901/b75fcb5d/attachment-0004.html>