true..but since RHEL and CentOS believe in backporting you get the same features without having to install new versions(which usually introduces new bugs)..<G>.. Johnny Hughes wrote: > On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 06:24, William Warren wrote: > >>depends on your definition of downlgrade..i see it as the >>oposite..fedora's lifecycle is not nearly as long as RHEL 3..:) > > > Agreed, from a stability and lifecycle perspective, CentOS is much > better than (and in my opinion an upgrade to) Fedora Core 1. > > But from a package perspective, many of the items in an up2date Fedora > Core 1 install are newer than the packages in CentOS, so they won't > upgrade via yum (since the installed Fedora Core 1 packages are already > newer). > > >>Johnny Hughes wrote: >> >> >>>On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 20:51, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> >>> >>>>It is a downgrade and not an upgrade to go from CentOS to Fedora Core 1 >>>>... CentOS is an upgrade from RedHat 9 but a Downgrade from FC1. >>> >>> >>>I meant that it is a downgrade to go from FC1 to CentOS ... as RHEL 3 >>>was released from RedHat 9.0 code, then FC1 was released later. >>> >>>Johnny Hughes > > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at caosity.org > http://www.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- My "Foundation" verse: Isa 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their righteousness is of me, saith the LORD. -- carpe ductum -- "Grab the tape"