[CentOS] General question on QA from a Fedora Core fan
Ryan
ryanag at zoominternet.net
Fri Apr 29 02:37:24 UTC 2005
My $.02 is that CentOS is a great desktop OS, and I find myself happy
not to have to constantly reformat and repair my desktop because I
installed unstable software.
Hardy Beltran Monasterios wrote:
> El jue, 28-04-2005 a las 15:42 -0500, Steve Bergman escribió:
>
>>Apologies if this ends up a dup, but there seems to have been a problem
>>with my original subscription.
>>
>>[ snip ]
>>
>>On the positive side, looking at the errata, it looks as though CentOS
>>has drastically fewer notices than Fedora, and I assume that is because
>>there really are more problems (security of otherwise) shaken out during
>>testing.
>>
>>Obviously, not being forced to upgrade due to withdrawal of support with
>>regards to security patches every 1.5 years is a plus.
>>
>>So I welcome comments. If I switch my clients from Fedora to CentOS,
>>they don't have the latest and greatest (and, for example, I need
>>OpenOffice 2.0 ASAP for one of my clients due to it's Access-like
>>interface to PostgreSQL), but how much advantage am I really looking at
>>with regards to stability?
>>
>>i.e. I know all the reasons that CentOS *should* be more rock solid
>>stable. But is there a noticeable difference in reality?
>>
>
> It depedens what do you want to do, what do you need. There is no distro
> for all tasks.
>
> In my particular case I prefer to use CentOS in the side server for
> their stability and more importan for me, the long support that this
> Enterprise class distro offer (by RH promess).
>
> For my clients wich uses Linux in the side server my recomendations are
> the same. And by example I have a customer wich develops applications
> with PHP/Postgress/MySQL they can't afford the costly effort to upgrade
> his development/production/test servers and the worst case test his
> application with the new version of PHP and MySQL which we see in Fedora
> in almost each release. For them the "version stability" is a very
> critical issue.
>
> But I tink that CentOS is not very useful in the desktop side, where we
> need each time use recent version of the applications. I think in the
> desktop side is not much important "version estability/freeze".
>
> My self I use Debian for my desktop and CentOS for my servers. With
> Debian always can I get the newer "killer app" for Gnome.
>
>
>
>>Thanks For Any Input.
>>
>>Sincerely,
>>Steve Bergman
>>
>
>
>
More information about the CentOS
mailing list