[CentOS] MailScanner With One vs Two Postfix Instances
Jens Vagelpohl
jens at dataflake.orgSun Apr 10 10:32:32 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] MailScanner With One vs Two Postfix Instances
- Next message: [CentOS] MailScanner With One vs Two Postfix Instances
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Apr 10, 2005, at 6:50, Johnny Hughes wrote: > The postfix guys also say compile your own and don't use the distro > version. I say, also use RPMs so you can continue to get security > updates. Even though this topic of prepackaged-vs-RPM is a total rat-hole I'd like to note that the "anti-prepackaged" attitude most likely stems from the fact that most distros ship either ancient versions or versions that simply don't have a lot of desired extensions (or "usable versions" of these extensions) linked in. For me the postfix that shipped with Centos4 was the first RPM that I successfully used in a setup where LDAP and SASL play important roles, everywhere else I had to roll my own. jens
- Previous message: [CentOS] MailScanner With One vs Two Postfix Instances
- Next message: [CentOS] MailScanner With One vs Two Postfix Instances
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list