[CentOS] MailScanner With One vs Two Postfix Instances
Jens Vagelpohl
jens at dataflake.orgMon Apr 11 08:35:37 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] MailScanner With One vs Two Postfix Instances
- Next message: [CentOS] MailScanner With One vs Two Postfix Instances
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Apr 11, 2005, at 8:16, Franki wrote: > Now that is interesting. I can see what my next mail server will be > running. > > I was not happy to have to compile it all myself, for the reasons > mentioned. > Plus I've always been happier with rpm based systems, not that there > is anything wrong with apt, but I started using linux back in early RH > 4 days and redhat is what I got to know. > > How does redhats rpm tools compare to mandrakes urpm* tools? I'm in the same boat - "grew up" on RedHat so I want to stick with the same environment. The only RPM tool I use is yum, which I've been using for a couple years now. It's all I need. jens
- Previous message: [CentOS] MailScanner With One vs Two Postfix Instances
- Next message: [CentOS] MailScanner With One vs Two Postfix Instances
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list