[CentOS] CentOS 4 and Intel P4 without Hyper-Threading vs. IntelP4 with Hyper-Threading
Paul Heinlein
heinlein at madboa.comWed Apr 20 16:21:43 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] CentOS 4 and Intel P4 without Hyper-Threading vs. IntelP4 with Hyper-Threading
- Next message: [CentOS] CentOS 4 and Intel P4 without Hyper-Threading vs. IntelP4 with Hyper-Threading
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 4/20/05 9:09 AM, Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote: > BTW, do note that HT processor still has only single core. Some reports > indicate that there's not much advantage of HT over non-HT processors > (and consequently not much advantage of running SMP kernel on HT > processor). Fully realizing that the plural of "anecdote" is not "data," I can report that enabling HT and running an SMP kernel speeds up parallel make operations by 15-20%. E.g., running "make -j2" on P4/HT/SMP is slightly faster than "make -j2" on the same processor running a UP kernel. It seems like the SMP kernel is better able to keep the core busy than the UP kernel. Other operations, particularly day-to-day desktop stuff, seemingly don't benefit much at all. -- Paul Heinlein <> heinlein at madboa.com <> www.madboa.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] CentOS 4 and Intel P4 without Hyper-Threading vs. IntelP4 with Hyper-Threading
- Next message: [CentOS] CentOS 4 and Intel P4 without Hyper-Threading vs. IntelP4 with Hyper-Threading
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list