On Apr 9, 2005 7:34 PM, Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists at hughesjr.com> wrote: > > > > I should also point out that there is absolutely NO implied criticism > > of the SUPERB guides Johnny has put out. I have found them to be > > extremely helpful -- thanks, Johnny! > > No offense taken ... :) Good. I was a little worried about that. :-) > > The new method is a bit easier, and I am working now on a guide for > CentOS-4 that does it the new way and uses cyrus-imapd. > > I have used the other way (two postfixes) on several high volume > servers, and have personally had no problems. Other people have said > they sometimes have issues with the two postfix setup. > On a related point: I have been reading over in the postfix user list archives how they are *really* down on mixing MailScanner and Postfix. They say fairly serious queue, email and filesystem corruption is a certainty. Yikes. I'm stressing out now that I just invested a ton of time coming up to speed on MailScanner over the past 10 days. :-\ Anyone have advice for me? Is it really that bad? Does the one instance of Postfix help (or better yet *fix*) this issue? Do recent versions make things any better/worse here? They seem to like amavisd-new. > > As soon as we finish CentOS-4.1 (or maybe before, depending on how long > RH takes to go from the beta update1 to it's release), I should be able > to change my CentOS-3.x guide to the single postfix instance mode and > get a CentOS-4 postfix guide out the door. > Glad to help if I can. Regards, Kennedy