We have used g4u for imaging all sorts of systems (XP,W2K,98,RH). Seems to work very well in most situations. In a couple of situations we have gone back to Ghost if g4u didn't work. Andrew -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org]On Behalf Of Maciej Zenczykowski Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 5:37 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: RE: [CentOS] Does CentOS has problems with Norton Ghost 2003 images? > We've successfully used g4l on CentOS 3.4 boxes, but as has been > mentioned, that's pre-SELinux. Due to the way g4u/g4l operate they don't give a damn about operating system / file system versions. They simply xerox the hard disk. If backing up a single partition doesn't work (unlikely but possible) than you can always backup the entire disk - thats 99.9999% guaranteed to work - if it doesn't work it's hardware issues and nothing to do with the file system or operating system versions (there's no filesystem or operating system dependent code within g4u/g4l). Cheers, MaZe. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS at centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos