[CentOS] Re: OT - RPM queries [was Re: Firefox, Flash and Java on CentOS 4.1 x86-64]

Phil Schaffner P.R.Schaffner at IEEE.org
Sat Aug 13 00:48:19 UTC 2005


On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 22:11 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: 
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Bryan J. Smith wrote:
> 
> > Karanbir Singh <Mail-Lists at karan.org> wrote:
> > > I agree with OT, your post had little use for someone who
> > > uses CentOS.
> > 
> > I don't know how many times I've posted something and people thought it 
> > was off-topic when it was only viewed that way because of their 
> > *IGNORANCE* -- not mine.  ;->

As the one who originally introduced "OT" to the thread subject, I would
like to apologize for any unintended offense to Bryan.  I meant OT for
the thread, not the list, and was glad of the rare opportunity to ANSWER
a question from him.  :-)

> 
> Now would be a good time to become paranoia :)
> 
>  >> Insert your conspiracy theory here <<

Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean nobody's out to get you!
:-)

On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 15:53 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> I am sure you are aware of the fact that using these repo's on a
> CentOS Machine will cause you more damage than most people really
> want. Expect to reinstall the OS if you have those repo's enabled and
> run through a few pkg install cycles. And dont expect CentOS to
> provide you with any useful updates anymore.

Personally, I would find my CentOS4 desktops much less useful without
Dag and some other 3rd party repos (particularly karan.org and Dries),
and I certainly would have a hard time getting the wife and kids weened
from the Redmond OS without Java, Flash, downloaded music players, DVD
support, etc.  I realize there is always some risk involved with
deviating from the core distro, and avoid that on servers and critical
machines, but am willing to accept the risks for non-critical desktops.
Worst case, one can always do a fresh install, but I have been through
quite a few cycles of updates with
--enablerepo=<various_selected_3rd_party_repos> for a number of personal
and work machines without breaking things that badly (at least on CentOS
- FC is another story :-).

Judging from recent list traffic, many others have the same needs and
appreciate help on those topics.  (Just wish some of them would search
the archives.)

Phil





More information about the CentOS mailing list