[CentOS] Choosing to put CentOS in terms of itself ...
Preston Crawford
me at prestoncrawford.comThu Aug 18 18:55:59 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] Choosing to put CentOS in terms of itself ...
- Next message: [CentOS] Choosing to put CentOS in terms of itself ...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Bryan J. Smith wrote: > Preston Crawford <me at prestoncrawford.com> wrote: >> Regardless of whether Red Hat deserves credit for their >> work, that's their user experience. > > If you go all the way back to even the "vote for CentOS" > thread, I have _never_ even suggested such. In fact, I > differed with those who did. > > 100% of the reason why I even bring up the development > history is the same reason I bring up anything else, to help > someone avoid the assumptions and run into the same issues. > Now I've done it enough times now, and I will avoid doing it > again. I think it's helpful. Someone should write a "where do babies come from?"-style FAQ that deals with CentOS/RHEL/Fedora/Red Hat, etc. so people understand the virtuous cycle that is the constellation of Red Hat and RHEL-derived products. Preston
- Previous message: [CentOS] Choosing to put CentOS in terms of itself ...
- Next message: [CentOS] Choosing to put CentOS in terms of itself ...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list