[CentOS] Why shouldn't I expect more of CentOS/Linux?
Bryan J. Smith
b.j.smith at ieee.orgMon Aug 22 12:37:14 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] Why shouldn't I expect more of CentOS/Linux?
- Next message: [CentOS] Why shouldn't I expect more of CentOS/Linux?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dave Gutteridge <dave at tokyocomedy.com> wrote: > But assuming two different distros have the 2.6 kernel, > then why shouldn't they both be capable of running the same > software? Leonard Isham <leonard.isham at gmail.com> wrote: > The kernel is only the base that the distro is built on. In fact, the C Libraries (GNU C Libraries, GLibC) and GNU C/Compiler [Collection] (GCC) is far more to do with binary compatibility than different Linux 2.x kernels. -- Bryan J. Smith | Sent from Yahoo Mail mailto:b.j.smith at ieee.org | (please excuse any http://thebs413.blogspot.com/ | missing headers)
- Previous message: [CentOS] Why shouldn't I expect more of CentOS/Linux?
- Next message: [CentOS] Why shouldn't I expect more of CentOS/Linux?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list