[CentOS] Why shouldn't I expect more of CentOS/Linux?
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comMon Aug 22 16:22:55 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] Why shouldn't I expect more of CentOS/Linux?
- Next message: [CentOS] Why shouldn't I expect more of CentOS/Linux?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 10:34, Johnny Hughes wrote: > The reason I do recommend DAG and Dries repos (and currently not any > others) is because they do have specific EL4 repos that only contain > items that build on EL4 ... so at least you know the libraries work with > EL4. I still limit the packages in either of those repos to only > install packages not in CentOS repos. > > ATRPMS also has EL4 stuff, but there are too many changes to core system > files for my taste in that repo, and I use freshrpms all the time for > FC, but I don't recommend it for EL4. Both of these are good repos, I > just don't use them for CentOS. Is there any chance of coordinating official centosplus/centosextras repositories with as much stuff as possible compiled against the same base libraries? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] Why shouldn't I expect more of CentOS/Linux?
- Next message: [CentOS] Why shouldn't I expect more of CentOS/Linux?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list