On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 08:29 +0200, Bjorn Andersenq wrote: > Ohh. Then im' sorry. I have only tried it in Fedora. I didn't know they > had disabled it in RHEL. Yep. Remember, SLAs ... SLAs ... SLAs ... They don't want to even give you the option. ;-> With that said, XFS _does_ support SELinux. XFS has typically supported everything Ext3 has, and even more early on (e.g., quotas, POSIX ACLs correctly, etc...). SGI ported XFS whole from Irix, and like Ext3 (from Ext2), it's design hasn't been changed from its core structure since the mid-'90s. ReiserFS wasn't designed with UNIX/inode/meta compatibility in mind, hence why there are issues with feature/service compatibility until someone writes some wrapper/mitigating code. JFS was ported from OS/2, not AIX (because of IP concerns with Monterey -- this was before IBM pulled out of Monterey), so they had a massive amount of code to put back in for UNIX/inode/meta compatibility that they are still working on. -- Bryan J. Smith b.j.smith at ieee.org http://thebs413.blogspot.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ DISCLAIMER: Assume all statements above are not factual and made only for any possible entertainment or other non-redeeming value.