On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 07:46 +0800, Michael Boman wrote: > On 8/3/05, Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists at hughesjr.com> wrote: > > > > CentOS-4 is NOT KDE 3.4 ... it is KDE 3.3.1 > > > > Unless you update KDE from the kde-redhat repository > (http://kde-redhat.sf.net), but then again you have moved away from a > pure CentOS installation and it's stability can't be guaranteed nor > officially supported. No argument that moving away from tested core packages may compromise stability, but (at the risk of starting a semantic argument :-) can one talk about "official support" here? This is, after all, not RHEL. (e.g. Is CentOSplus official? Guess not - plenty of caveats about replacing core packages, but it works pretty well for me.) The community support is very good, even for "deviants". > It also means that things may break when you do > updates as official repositories/packages are only tested against the > installations based on official packages. No argument here, except for another nit-pick with "official". Back OT, still never figured out how to get kdm to support multiple sessions on :1, :2, ... as is reported to work on FC. Any other clues out there? Cheers, Phil