On 8/16/05, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez at ivazquez.net> wrote: > On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 17:05 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote: > > I am doing contract work, and was requested to install FC2 > > on my machine (last October). Since doing that, I have > > tentatively concluded that the Fedora Core Project is > > more or less beta test, and not really suitable for development > > work. Please anyone correct me if I am wrong. > > This is in fact incorrect. CentOS is a better choice for remote servers > or machines that you don't want to upgrade every year or so, but that > doesn't make Fedora "beta" quality. It just has a more experimental > nature and a shorter life cycle. I'd say that's up for debate. I don't enjoy constantly refreshing Fedora installs on my desktop so I use CentOS. Of course, opinions are like kids (everyone has one and only theirs is right)... <snip> > > Is there any reasonable hope of an "upgrade" from FC2 to CentOS > > 4.1 or should/must I backup, install, and restore? > > A clean install is recommended, although an upgrade may be possible. > You may have some luck following the steps for upgrading a FC3-FC4 installation: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/YumUpgradeFaq Greg