On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 13:39 +1000, Tim Edwards wrote: > Philip Wyett wrote: > > > > This "feature" does not appear in any FC SRPM right up the the FC5 > > development 1.5.0. :-( > > > > Regards > > > > Phil > > Thanks. Why would Redhat do this? They're all still in the Gaim 1.5.0 > source code and in the gaim-1.5.0 RPM from Mandriva on my home system, > and as you said they're still in Fedora - why would they remove them > from RHEL4 all of a sudden? > I would be hesitant to start guessing the reasons behind the change. The thing that annoys me is the replacement icons look horrible (of low quality), if they were going to replace them with a custom set that were of high quality I could maybe understand. Also, the half a job and experimentation in the enterprise is just not on. Time to think about my upcoming RHEL subscription renewals if they think they can do this as the norm! Regards Phil -- Personal email: philip.wyett at w-tech.co.uk Work email: pwyett at a-novo.co.uk Blog: http://www.philipwyett.blogspot.com -- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050826/150b26af/attachment-0005.sig>