On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 19:27 +0200, Patrick wrote: > On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 11:02 -0500, rado wrote: > > Hi Patrick, > > > > I run a HA(High Availability) technique that I developed myself whereas > > 2 servers are redundant syncing up bout every 15-20 seconds. Basically > > mine is IP oriented instead of machine oriented...either machine can be > > the master and will stay the master until the slave deems the master as > > having problems and not being able to handle the server > > responsibilities. When the slave decides this, it then grabs the roaming > > IP and turns on the servers and it is then the master. > > > > If a redundant HA server is machine oriented, that means that, yes, the > > slave will take over but as soon as the master comes back on line, the > > master takes back the roaming ip and starts up the servers and the slave > > machine will assume slave responsibilities again. > > > > these are just some ideas of what you are looking for. Also, google > > around using High Availability as a keyword...a bunch out there I think, > > I am just about to the point to start building up my web-site where I > > will cover my system in depth. > > > > Incidently, over the last month or so, the main server seems to loose it > > and decides to reboot in which case, the slave takes over...I have never > > been around when it actually happened and sometimes I never even > > realized it for a day or so. It's kinda seamless and the switch takes > > bout 20 seconds. My point, I do know it works as it should! > > Hi John, > > Thanks for your suggestion. The 20 seconds is a bit long for the telco > service being out of order but I will further investigate the HA stuff > over at linux-ha.org to see if it can be tweaked. > > Regards, > Patrick I hear ya Patrick, the only reason it is bout 20 secs is because I cannot just flush the cache in this bs zoom router...I have to reboot it in the code...if I had a router that I could flush the cache I could do it in about 5-6 secs which is much better but, hey, I don't really need it, I don't have bunches goin on and I just do it to do it. John > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos