[CentOS] Re: Planning Mail Server (with low resources)
Craig White
craigwhite at azapple.com
Thu Dec 8 00:40:53 UTC 2005
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 19:20 -0500, Bill Diamond wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Feizhou" <feizhou at graffiti.net>
>
> >> On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:58:20PM -0500, Alain Reguera wrote:
> >>
> >>>Thank for clean my doubt about cyrus' storing folders.
> >>>
> >>>Partitioning(in MB):
> >>>/ 1.000
> >>>/boot/ 100
> >>>swap 512
> >>>/tmp/ 500
> >>>/usr/ 5.000
> >>>/var/ 10.000
> >>>/var/spool/imap/ 22.888
> >>
> >>
> >> You still want to have /home on a separated filesystem. You just don't
> >> need it to be big.
> >
> > If he wants system users. In his case where this box sole use is mail
> > (Alain please confirm) I don't really see a need for a separate /home if
> > there is nobody to use it.
>
> If he's going to set this up for IMAP, then certainly putting /home onto a
> separate drive, not just a separate partition, will be very beneficial.
> This can enable him to do some pretty cool things, like using spamassassin
> and procmail to automatically filter out spam into seperate folders.
>
> On my admittedly small setup, I also have scripts run that look for any
> messages in the user's home maildir "Missed Spam" folder and "Not Spam"
> folder. In the "Missed Spam" folder, I have it automatically rescore the
> messages using sa-learn. In the "Not Spam" folder, it's a bit trickier, but
> using formail along with spamassassin, I can reprocess false positives,
> strip the headers, and redeliver them appropriately.
-----
you must have been sound asleep through all of the discussion where he
is using cyrus-imapd which doesn't do maildir, uses it's own method of
delivery (not procmail), it's own filtering (sieve) and doesn't do home
folders and thus your comments - though well intended have already been
considered to be not germane to his setup.
Craig
More information about the CentOS
mailing list