[CentOS] How to select a motherboard -- CPU architectures and chipsets
Bryan J. Smith
thebs413 at earthlink.net
Thu Dec 15 18:04:17 UTC 2005
Feizhou <feizhou at graffiti.net> wrote:
> Eh? http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_16450.html
> They specifically highlight NCQ on page 4 for their SATA
> implementation.
According to the SATA/libata status page:
http://linux.yyz.us/sata/sata-status.html#nvidia
I guess they were talking about the MCP-03, instead of the
newer MCP-04? In any case, I'm not getting NCQ support on my
nForce4 serieschipsets under Windows. I guess some just
don't include it?
> Well, they are not talking about ATA...
ATA = SATA
You can have NCQ on parallel ATA too.
It's just a physical/datalink layer difference.
> they are talking about SCSI like tag command queueing
> on their SATA side of things,
Between the drive and [software] host, individually. Then
you use [software] host AHCI to control and schedule up to 32
drives.
My point is that it's still not a hardware-based host
adapter. It's only the end-device component, with a software
host.
> you know, Native Command Queueing. No, not NForce 2 or 3
> or 4 but Nforce 4 Ultra and above (Nforce4 SLI, Nforce Pro
> 2xxx)
Yeah, it seems the regular nForce 4 and at least the nForce
410 (not sure about the 430) don't have it.
> Jeff does not get anything. He does not list Nvidia
> implementations of their SATA controllers as 'open' like
the
> Intel AHCI and Silicon Image 3112 among others.
I stand corrected then.
As I said, I heard 2nd hand.
--
Bryan J. Smith | Sent from Yahoo Mail
mailto:b.j.smith at ieee.org | (please excuse any
http://thebs413.blogspot.com/ | missing headers)
More information about the CentOS
mailing list