[CentOS] why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comThu Dec 1 14:48:44 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Next message: [CentOS] why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 05:24, Bryan J. Smith wrote:
> Well, CentOS certainly seems to be the "bitch list" as of late.
> Welcome to the party! ;->
Complaints about small things should be taken as a sign of
overall success of the distribution. It means the problems
aren't big enough to give up or move to a different product
and people's expectations have been raised.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Next message: [CentOS] why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list