[CentOS] Re: Planning Mail Server (with low resources)
Tom Diehl
tdiehl at rogueind.comWed Dec 7 02:16:45 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: Planning Mail Server (with low resources)
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: Planning Mail Server (with low resources)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Rodrigo Barbosa wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 12:12:07PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: >> On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 10:33, Rodrigo Barbosa wrote: >>> So yes, you are right, Postfix was developed from scratch. But you >>> are wrong when you say qmail was not the basis for postfix. >> >> I think a better description of the history would be to say that >> qmail was so bad that Wietse started from scratch to write something >> useful. And meanwhile, the problems with sendmail that they both >> set out to fix were solved anyway. > > Wietse didn't write postfix because of qmail, but because of DJB. What does any of this have to do with centos? PLEASE stop the useless history lesson. The s/n ratio on this list has been extreamly poor during the last few weeks. Can we please get back to meaningful discussions or in the absence of that have some quiet? Regards, Tom
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: Planning Mail Server (with low resources)
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: Planning Mail Server (with low resources)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list