Dustin Krysak wrote: > Are there any known issues with using bacula with centos 4.2? > > How about a recipe of some kind? I've used it without any problems. I've built my own RPM packages from SRPM. Didn't quite liked the prebuilt ones. Changes include running director and storage daemon as non-priviledged users, removing real passwords from configuration files, resolved conflict with system provided mtx package. Maybe there were some other small stuff. And I'm usually faster to build my own RPMs when new versions are out, then waiting for them to appear on Bacula's download site.