-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 09:24:33PM -0600, Kevin Krieser wrote:
> ># rpm -q --qf "%{ARCH}\n" kernel
> >i586
> >
> >Unless you mean that CentOS provides 586 kernels, even if RH doesn't.
> >
> >In any case, I think it needs clarification.
>
> Apparently Centos recompiles it for 586. I figured that they would
> have the same limitation in this regard than Redhat.
That is why I proposed a clarification. I don't have any RH machines here,
and every one I used in the past 2 years were 686+, so I could not verify
it.
Since it would be either a misinterpretation of what redhat distributes,
or CentOS building for i586, I got confusing, at least for me.
> At work we still have to use Redhat, due to customer requirements.
I really can't see anyone paying for RHEL and using it on outdated
hardware. Of course I might be wrong here, and I'm sure there are
some exceptions. Maybe test boxes. In any case, I can understand why
RH doesn't ship 586- kernels.
[]s
PS: Drifting too far into politics now. If we decide to continue this
discussion, I would like to suggest the linux-practices list :)
- --
Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob at suespammers.org>
"Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur"
"Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDpiu7pdyWzQ5b5ckRArnyAJ9j0Rd0lZzbRWg8kLYbIp1N6ipKtQCglcwo
LWPJ7qgrk4Q/toGfjyT3agA=
=ZM+S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----