On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 15:24 -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote: > From: Craig White [mailto:craigwhite at azapple.com] > > > > On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 13:01 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > > > On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 12:19, Bowie Bailey wrote: > > > > > > > I was able to get OpenLDAP to compile against db4.3. Any > > > > particular reason it isn't recommended? > > > > > > I see fedora directory server just made the 1.0 release. Might > > > that be a better choice? > > > > > > http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Main_Page > > > > > ---- > > I doubt that it would be a better choice but I would agree that it > > is indeed a choice. One of those things where there isn't a black > > and white better daemon. This however doesn't answer OP's question. > > It is an interesting choice. It supports multi-master replication > which I will need and has some GUI management utilities. > > Anyone know of any problems with it? ---- Seems that it languished for a long time after Sun bought it from AOL before Red Hat bought it from Sun (it was originally known as Netscape Directory Server). I don't think it supports schema checking. I got the impression that it isn't that fast. I don't think that there are many people using the newly revised open source version. Craig