Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists at hughesjr.com> wrote: > I agree with Karanbir here ... and if / when we build it > ... it will probably be because the Enterprise version is > released, for EL3 and EL4, available only to paying > customers, and is different than the FDS version. And that's an excellent approach. I'm sure you're seeing what happens if and when there is SRPM for RHDS -- if ever. It could be likely be you'll never see one, because the future 1.x series will just be FDS -- bit for bit. In case it isn't clear to many, this is not like RHEL which is a 18-month released based on 2-3 revisions of RHL/FC. This is a project-product added to the distro, and is the same that runs on either series. But according to the FAQ, they don't even have the codebase working with autoconf/automate yet, so I'd say it'll be a bit before you can even rebuild FDS from SRPM directly. So any RHEL SRPM will be behind that (if offered at all -- again, probably not if it's 0 different). -- Bryan J. Smith | Sent from Yahoo Mail mailto:b.j.smith at ieee.org | (please excuse any http://thebs413.blogspot.com/ | missing headers)