Am Sa, den 03.12.2005 schrieb Kai Schaetzl um 22:31: > Alexander Dalloz wrote on Fri, 02 Dec 2005 15:36:55 +0100: > > At least narrowed in the long run comparable values you can get by > > lm_sensors, if your motherboard has a sensor chip which is supported by > > that tool. "yum install lm_sensors" and run "sensors-detect". > > Actually, sensors (lm_sensors) gives me mostly bogus values on all > machines that I tried it recently, although I ran a successful > sensors-detect. The only thing which seems to be correct are fan speeds. > voltage and temperature are way off (if they were true the machine > wouldn't start up at all or burnt to death). Is there anything I have to > do after the sensors-detect run? > > Kai You may have to adjust settings in /etc/sensors.conf, depending on the sensors chip the motherboard has. It is too a good idea to read about the sensors chip and its support by lm_sensors on the project's website. Sometimes the chip manufacturer does not provide information about the hardware, so that reverse engineering has been done. Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp Serendipity 18:29:00 up 36 days, 16:29, load average: 0.25, 0.17, 0.11 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20051204/d195f89e/attachment-0005.sig>