>> What to consider about it? If on the main dag site/mirror the admins
>> "don't know something has been wrong for the last couple of weeks",
>> the dag-project is indeed a bit flaky at times, right?
>>
>> I looked around for the state of affairs on dag packages and/or mirrors.
>> For example in the archive of the just mentioned RPMforge. Not a single
>> message in december yet.
>>
>
> What to consider is that you (more dominik) are biting a hand that
> feeds you for free not only in giving you rebuilt rpms that magically
> work on your system but also that the site is a test bed for one of
> the most important pieces of software in the world used by millions of
> people a day (Apache).
>
> So maybe a little patience, assistance in solving the problem, and
> perhaps even gratitude/donation would be in order rather than just
> "OMG, dag's site provided me an RPM and then the update is broken and
> I emailed him and it has taken a week to solve the problem!" which is
> how I read you and Dominik's messages.
I don't bit a hand because of wrong checksum. I understand Dag repo is
Dag's good will and patience is recomended.
I am only confused about no one can answer what's going on.
Regards.
--
____________________________________________________________________
D o m i n i k S k ł a d a n o w s k i