Robin Mordasiewicz wrote: > less resource intensive becuase of the indexes, which are small databases > which contain information about the users mail. Don't make your choice > base on this alone, becuase it is not very easy to cluster cyrus servers. I don't have it in production, but it wasn't too hard to set up an imap murder scenario. And adding additional backend servers to that is a piece of cake. > If you only have one server then choose cyrus, but if you possibly are > able to accumulate older servers to cluster them, then choose courier. I don't see the "hardship" in clustering cyrus imap boxes. And I don't see the ease in clustering courier servers, but I've never done that, so I'm probably not the person to judge about that. Ralph -- Ralph Angenendt......ra at br-online.de | .."Text processing has made it possible Bayerischer Rundfunk...HA-Multimedia | ....to right-justify any idea, even one Rundfunkplatz 1........80300 München | .which cannot be justified on any other Tl:089.5900.16023..Fx:089.5900.16240 | ..........grounds." -- J. Finnegan, USC -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20051207/9997fcb6/attachment-0005.sig>