Craig White wrote: > On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 01:42 +0800, Feizhou wrote: > >>>Typing this, what does this have with the topic of using Cyrus? It's the >>>storage. Cyrus will work with SAN as happy as it will work with local >>>drives. >> >>Not in a cluster it won't. That's the point. Two cyrus boxes sharing a >>SAN = nightmare. If they don't recommend NFS, they won't recommend a SAN >>either. Hence their murder scheme which will not provide HA of all >>mailboxes. > > ---- > this has gone so far afield it isn't relevant to much of anything. Oh yeah? > > If you are going for HA and tying it all to a single SAN server, then > where is your single point of breakage? I never said SAN server. I said SAN. > > This doesn't relate to but a very tiny percentage of users on this list > and those that are choosing SAN are making careful evaluations of all of > the software that they use. Like I said, I am out to find out what limitations there are of different mail-related software. Things have come down this route because somebody pointed out MURDER to me in response to a question I had about how one would run cyrus in a cluster. It looks like I am done given the way things are heading.