-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 01:57:48PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > > I know this may sound old fashioned, but what is wrong with rdump > > for that ? I think that for this particular case, dump/rdump would > > be a better option (backup). > > If you are doing archival copies tar/dump/rdump make sense. If you > want a close-to-current disk copy that you can mount instantly > or a warm-spare host (...) Point taken. Tkx. - -- Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob at suespammers.org> "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDl0IypdyWzQ5b5ckRArNtAJ4l0hLio+oOEaVvVAHCdMPfd9iKWgCdHkjj grNSfduzGQWQXIm+uu7Bd+c= =IzSB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----